The scoring logic is exposed
Every part of the published question and evaluation method is mapped against what the draft actually says.
Antsflow Critical Section Review · UK & Ireland
A 48-hour review and evidence-led rewrite of one existing scored answer, up to 1,500 words. We map the published criteria, challenge vague claims and return an editable version grounded only in facts you approve.
£495 + applicable taxes · 48 hours after complete intake · one scored answer up to 1,500 words · full fee before start
Critical Section Review
Synthetic question 4.2 · Mobilisation
Margin comments, evidence challenges and one client-verifiable rewrite.
Does this answer visibly address every scored requirement with specific, supportable evidence?
What changes
Every part of the published question and evaluation method is mapped against what the draft actually says.
Vague promises, unsupported claims and missing operational detail are replaced or clearly flagged for client evidence.
The client receives a revised working answer and can verify every fact, commitment and wording choice before submission.
Your working pack
Every item is tied to the agreed tender scope and remains subject to your factual verification and approval.
A compact breakdown of the requirement, sub-parts, score signals, word limit and evidence expectations visible in the pack.
Specific comments showing omissions, weak proof, unclear ownership, generic language, contradictions and word-count pressure.
Targeted questions for missing metrics, examples, controls, responsibilities or authorised proof that would materially improve the answer.
One revised response, up to the agreed 1,500-word limit, grounded only in client-supplied and approved information.
A short record of facts, commitments, names, numbers and attachments that the authorised client owner must verify before submission.
Forty-eight-hour cadence
Confirm the question, evaluation criteria, word limit, draft version, evidence, deadline and exclusions in writing before the clock starts.
Test the answer against each requirement and identify missing specificity, proof, ownership, controls and measurable outcomes.
Build the editable answer, run consistency and word-count checks, and issue the factual verification checklist.
A strong fit when
Before you ask
One scored question, one existing draft and one revised answer up to 1,500 words, together with the listed review pack and one written clarification round.
This offer requires an existing draft. If no usable draft exists, the question can be considered within a separately scoped Response Sprint.
Method statements, mobilisation, contract management, quality assurance, social value, sustainability, workforce, business continuity and other scored narrative questions can fit when the scope and evidence are clear.
Only when they are supplied, supportable and approved by the client. Missing proof is flagged; it is never invented.
After scope acceptance, cleared payment and receipt of the complete agreed question, draft, criteria and evidence through the approved route.
Written scope review
Give us enough public context to assess fit. For a partner enquiry, describe the expected volume and turnaround. Do not upload or paste the tender pack, personal data, credentials or confidential evidence into this form. A secure transfer route is agreed only after scope.
More than one answer needs work?
The £950 Tender Review maps one live tender and existing draft requirement by requirement, then prioritises the corrections before submission.
Explore the Tender Review