Requirements stop hiding
Mandatory items, scored questions, word limits, attachments and submission mechanics are indexed against the draft.
Available now · £950 fixed professional fee
Antsflow Tender Review · UK & Ireland
Know what can lose the bid before the evaluator does.
A 72-hour, requirement-by-requirement review of one live tender and your existing draft. We expose compliance gaps, unsupported claims and weak scoring logic, then return a practical rewrite plan.
£950 + applicable taxes · 72 hours after complete intake · one tender / one lot · written process · full fee before start
Tender Review
Compliance and evaluator-risk matrix
Synthetic tender · Working draft v03
Priority viewCorrect before submission
R1 · MandatoryCovered
Q3 · QualityProof too vague
Q5 · Social valueOwner not named
Requirement mapping, specific risks and a prioritised correction plan.
The decision this sprint unlocks
Is this draft complete, supportable and easy for an evaluator to score against the published criteria?
What changes
From a dense tender pack to a controlled response.
Claims meet their evidence
Unsupported, vague or inconsistent statements are flagged before they become credibility or scoring problems.
Rewrites become prioritised
The response team receives a clear order of work based on compliance risk, evaluation weight and remaining time.
Your working pack
Tangible deliverables, not a generic report.
Every item is tied to the agreed tender scope and remains subject to your factual verification and approval.
Scope and assumption note
A written record of the tender, lot, draft version, page and word limits, supplied evidence, exclusions and review deadline.
Requirement compliance matrix
A clause-by-clause map of mandatory requirements, scored criteria, response locations, evidence references and open gaps.
Evaluator-risk report
A concise review of pass/fail exposure, unanswered requirements, generic language, contradictions and evidence weaknesses.
Annotated response review
Structured comments against the supplied draft showing where clarity, specificity, proof or scoring alignment needs attention.
Prioritised rewrite plan
A practical sequence of changes ranked by disqualification risk, available score, dependency and deadline pressure.
Submission-readiness checklist
A final checklist for formats, declarations, attachments, approvals, signatures and portal actions that remain with the client.
Seventy-two-hour cadence
Fast enough to protect the deadline. Controlled enough to be defensible.
- Start gate
Confirm scope and safe intake
The clock starts after written scope acceptance, signature, cleared payment and receipt of the complete agreed pack through the approved route.
- Day 1
Extract and map the requirements
Read the tender pack, identify mandatory and scored requirements, and map them against the existing response.
- Day 2
Challenge claims and scoring logic
Test whether each answer is specific, evidenced, internally consistent and visibly aligned to the evaluation criteria.
- Day 3
Deliver the correction plan
Finalise the matrix, annotated review, priority rewrites and submission checklist for client action and approval.
A strong fit when
You have a real opportunity, credible evidence and a deadline worth protecting.
- You have one live English-language UK or Irish tender, RFP, PQQ or SQ, one lot and an existing response draft.
- The tender pack is up to 150 pages and the reviewed response is up to 15,000 words unless re-scoped.
- The deadline leaves at least six working days for review, client correction and final approval.
- Your team can verify every factual claim and supply the supporting evidence it is authorised to share.
Before you ask
Commercial clarity from the start.
What does the £950 fee cover?
It covers one live tender, one lot, a pack up to 150 pages, an existing response up to 15,000 words, the listed deliverables and one written clarification round. Wider, multi-lot or unusually technical work is re-scoped before contracting.
What if no draft exists yet?
The Tender Review is designed to test an existing draft. If the response still needs to be built, the Tender Response Sprint is the better starting point.
Does Antsflow rewrite the answers?
The review identifies and prioritises specific rewrites. A small number of illustrative edits may be included to show the required standard, but full drafting belongs in the Response Sprint unless separately scoped.
How is the work produced?
Antsflow combines structured document analysis with evidence-led editorial review. Any software-assisted content is grounded in supplied material. You verify and approve every fact, commitment and final answer.
Does Antsflow submit the bid?
No. The client owns pricing, declarations, approvals, signatures, portal access and final submission. The service returns a working review pack and readiness checklist.
When does the 72-hour clock start?
After the written scope is accepted, the order form and services agreement are signed, the full fee has cleared and the complete agreed inputs are available through the approved transfer route.
Written scope review
Share the tender reference and deadline
Give us enough public context to assess fit. For a partner enquiry, describe the expected volume and turnaround. Do not upload or paste the tender pack, personal data, credentials or confidential evidence into this form. A secure transfer route is agreed only after scope.
- No sales call required
- No obligation to buy
- Exact scope before payment
- Every claim stays under your control
Need the response built?
Move from review to a complete working response pack.
The Tender Response Sprint maps the pack, structures the evidence and drafts the agreed quality answers for client verification and submission.
Explore the Response Sprint